Subject:      Re: Whip's legal lesson
From:         mayo@lightlink.com (David Mayo)
Date:         1996/02/02
Message-Id:   <4esnmc$i90@light.lightlink.com>
Sender:       electra@light.lightlink.com
Organization: Art Matrix - Lightlink Electra Gateway v2.4
Newsgroups:   alt.religion.scientology


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Whippersnapper <Whipsnap@cris.com> wrote:

>
>In message <4ejh14$kgm@light.lightlink.com>,
>mayo@lightlink.com (David Mayo) wrote:
>
>>Whippersnapper <Whipsnap@cris.com> wrote:
>
>>>In message <199601240856.DAA25574@light.lightlink.com>,
>>>mayo@lightlink.com (David Mayo) wrote:
>
>>>>Whippersnapper <Whipsnap@cris.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>mayo@lightlink.com (David Mayo) wrote:
>
>>[...]
>>>>>>>>What wrong was David Mayo supposedly trying to right? The guy 
>>>>>>>>did vast damage and was thrown out of the Church. I *saw* some 
>>>>>>>>of that damage, very, very, VERY directly.
>>[...]
>>>The talk over meals had mainly to do with Confessionals and some very
>>>specific point of technical practice that was a tad beyond my ken, 
>>>but considered diametrically opposed to LRH's data on same.
>
>>What you are describing is second or third hand information which you
>>didn't even understand.
>
>Direct contact with persons directly involved whom I've known for years 
>and have every reason to trust is enough for me.  In any case, I was not 
>referring to these technical matters in that statement you quoted.
>
Then you now admit that your statement above, "I *saw* some of
that damage, very, very, VERY directly." was false. I think this
is a prima facie case of malicious defamation.
>
>>Did you see any damage directly? Do you now 
>>publicly retract your original statement?
>
>I saw enough.  And no, any retraction would be false.
>
And you here refuse to retract. So be it.
>

>>>>>Later I was part of a unit producing public services.  Your 
>>>>>"office," in the person of a slightly stupid and constantly-ill 
>>>>>"missionaire," inexplicably extended its tentacles to that unit and 
>>>>>almost instantly halted its work and tore it apart.
>>[...]
>
>>>>I didn't send out any "missionaires". Missionaires were sent by
>>>>either Action FB or Action CMO INT, which was probably being run
>>>>by John Nelson or David Miscavige or Jon Horwich at the time. Do
>>>>you recall the slightly stupid and constantly-ill"missionaire"'s
>>>>name and what year this was? The public services unit was in
>>>>existence prior to me having anything to do with it. Perhaps the
>>>>missionaire went there before I knew of it. Give me a name.
>
>>>This guy called himself a "missionaire" and his contact in your 
>>>office his "ops."  He carried a hand-typed and photocopied set of 
>>>"project orders."  Of course you weren't responsible.
>
>>Are you being facetious?
>
>Yes.

Wilful mailicious intent.
>
>
>>Correct. I was not responsible. I did not have any missionaires,
>>I did not send out any missionaires, and what's more I had no guy(s)
>>working in my office. Now retract your statements AND state the
>>"missionaire"'s name, for the record, if there was one.
>>
[...]
>No, I will not name him.  It serves no purpose, despite the damage he did 
>on orders he said came from you directly.  Perhaps you'll recall him on 
>your own.

As I said there was no such person. I repeat I had no missionaire(s)
and there was no male working in my office or unit.

>
>- Whippersnapper

David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMRHfe+mCyCdNXuVZAQGjyAP+OtxY/gVQKJB2dmVFkpKQCFTa7b1PwuOG
p34nxp+FOb/W5Vv7bv0e+ItrJ6sZ3DtQiIKjMgzmrL52ioMiN8JAT+m1I25wTJzc
MImyAmYL5yBIcHix79n2wrgkG6Of7KOq4NcUfJghfE/qb34mpvgS5bpNDyzYA/R6
+verTAaO5cY=
=jgOL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

*******************************
David Mayo <mayo@lightlink.com>                  (finger for key)
PGP ID: 1024/4D5EE559 1996/01/04  David Mayo <mayo@lightlink.com>
PGP Fingerprint: 0D 69 92 87 79 2F 38 72  FE 03 CE 51 31 D5 6D E9
*****************************************************************