Subject: Re: Mayo and Solo NOTS From: David Mayo Date: 1996/05/15 Message-Id: <4nbl7f$paj@light.lightlink.com> Sender: electra@light.lightlink.com Organization: Art Matrix - Lightlink Electra Gateway v2.4 Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Sat, 11 May 1996 14:50:59 UTC, an557846@anon.penet.fi (David Cooke) wrote: > >Tilman Hausherr wrote in <318b0f63.6541018@news.snafu.de> > >> In <190356Z30041996@anon.penet.fi>, an557846@anon.penet.fi >> (David Cooke) wrote: > >>>The article goes on to state: >>> >>>"He spoke of how Ron developed the technique of Solo NOTS and >>>how Ron thoroughly researched this level... >>> >>>Since Mayo now asserts that NOTS (new OT5) was partly his own >>>work, it's good to see that he has already acknowledged that Solo >>>NOTS is L. Ron Hubbard's. > >>Be careful, David. Scientology is prohibited to say that Mayo didn't >>co-author the NOTS. I don't know how mentioning an article that you know >>is incorrect counts for the court. > >>Tilman > >I don't *know* that article is incorrect, although I expect plenty of a.r.s regulars will tell me that it >is. I've found publications like 'Source', 'Advance!' and 'High Winds' to be pretty reliable. David Ziff when he was the Editor of "Advance" magazine in the 1970s told me that he made up the "Success Stories" in 'Advance' magazine. I can't prove that now but it gives you a free shot at me. Hint, see next paragraph. > >If by "Scientology" you mean the Church of Scientology in the USA , which is involved in >various legal battles with Mayo and other squirrels, you'll notice they abide by the orders of >their country's courts and do not comment on pending cases. Just as I would not comment I thought you were acting as their agent. If you are not, then does what you say have import? Is it really you if you are using a "real name" from penet.fi or is this an example of excusable deniability? Where are you going to be on May 18? (19th in Oz to ensure you don't miss it) I am so excited I have goosebumps, don't you? ML, DM >publicly on any matter that was sub judice in an Australian court. Everyone should respect the >laws of their own land, but why pay any heed to foreign laws (unless one happens to be visiting >that country, of course)? I know very little about the American legal system, and care absolutely >nothing about it. Cantonese opera is easier to understand, and much more entertaining. > >David Cooke >cooke.david@pi.sa.gov.au > > > > >--****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--***ATTENTION* * >Your e-mail reply to this message WILL be *automatically* ANONYMIZED. >Please, report inappropriate use to abuse@anon.penet.fi >For information (incl. non-anon reply) write to help@anon.penet.fi >If you have any problems, address them to admin@anon.penet.fi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMZk9tOmCyCdNXuVZAQFp2AP/ZzVODJ6rRR6iDqfBf2b9qro5+UmyYtSp p6NDotYA8YHmKFI8SLguIQQm6EdB8Qo1JobI3HkOQRKntdaaiJGfkduE0UXzH0l2 AhETsk/xtRNROgZ3NDr1ejJWVLqVROGcgdrg+uYMFMebZmJNrr+ADegdJxcfw5xo M1i7M+bDf4w= =gtPQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----